N in Ancient DNA
#16
ADDITION: As for YF011185 individual (India, Andhra Pradesh) (https://www.yfull.com/tree/N-Y24317*/), in the article "Human population history at the crossroads of East and Southeast Asia since 11,000 years ago", the yDNA N-M231 individual, related to his population, is connected to the ancient Fujianese yDNA O1a-M119 sample of Chuanyun (https://www.theytree.com/tree/O-F492) [whose ancestors used to represent the population, connected to the rice farming Liangzhu culture of the Yangtze river basin, in which both Northeast China’s and mainland China’s ways of the processing of jade coexisted] and is connected to a more ancient sample, which was located somewhat closer to India’s Andhra Pradesh.

The models for Chuanyun:

Chuanyun: [33% Shandong Boshan] [67%Fujian Liangdao2] P=0.72 (“Ancient DNA indicates human population shifts and admixture in northern and southern China”)

Chuanyun: [37,5% Fujian Liangdao2] [62,5% Shandong Bianbian] P=0.28 ("Human population history at the crossroads of East and Southeast Asia since 11,000 years ago")

The study below shows that the percentage of yDNA N-M231 individuals, connected to a more ancient Pudong population of the more southern Shanghai-related neighbours of the Jiangsu Province, should be higher than the average in China (the Shanghai area was also a part of the Liangzhu culture’s area):

Forensic Analysis and Genetic Structure Construction of Chinese Chongming Island Han Based on Y Chromosome STRs and SNPs

https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/13/8/1363

“In the Chongming Han population, we observed that the proportion of the N-M231 haplogroup was 13.59%, while the proportion of the N-M231 haplogroup in the Pudong Han population was only 7.26%.”
Reply
#17
(05-03-2024, 06:02 PM)Zelto Wrote: Unveiling Hunnic legacy: Decoding elite presence in Poland through a unique child’s burial with modified cranium 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...9X24001913

The article is behind a paywall, but individual II with skull deformation; and interred with gold/silver objects was Y-hg N. The 'East Eurasian' Y-haplogroups associated with Hunnic burials so far, have been predominantly R1a-Z93 and Q. He clusters closely with other Hunnic/Nomad samples from Kazakhstan in the PCA (predominantly 'East Euraisan'; ~25% 'West Eurasian').

Individual I was entirely 'West Euraisan' and belonged to I1.

It would have been a good idea to sample the dog also.
Viking + Early Slav (6.153)
Viking + Kievan Rus (6.486)
Viking + Ostrogoth (7.664)
Viking + Scythian (7.684)
Ostrogoth + Kievan Rus (9.027)
Reply
#18
(05-03-2024, 06:02 PM)Zelto Wrote: Unveiling Hunnic legacy: Decoding elite presence in Poland through a unique child’s burial with modified cranium 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...9X24001913

The article is behind a paywall, but individual II with skull deformation; and interred with gold/silver objects was Y-hg N. The 'East Eurasian' Y-haplogroups associated with Hunnic burials so far, have been predominantly R1a-Z93 and Q. He clusters closely with other Hunnic/Nomad samples from Kazakhstan in the PCA (predominantly 'East Euraisan'; ~25% 'West Eurasian').

Individual I was entirely 'West Euraisan' and belonged to I1.

Regarding “Hunnic” practices, such as the artificial cranial deformation or the use of crows, the article “The deep population history of northern East Asia from the Late Pleistocene to the Holocene” had already included genetic connections, crucial to individuals, related to such practices, and these connections involve the ancient yDNA DE sample, whose genetic participation proved to be important for individuals, related to such practices in China’s areas, adjacent to Central Asia:
NE-8 M AR11K AR13-10K 11,601–11,176 46.01 125.82 SS 34 27 1.5 D4o DE 274 0.421 225,066
Perhaps, it may be thought that yDNA DE is associated with the population, which was especially a part of the progenitor of the Eurasian population, therefore, the embryonic states of human ideas, practices and linguistic types (including more rare ones), which separated between Africa and Eurasia, may be associated with the beginning of such an ancient yDNA DE population as well.

The development of the artificial cranial deformation in the Hongshan culture may be more closely related to medical practices, since a known mutation, associated with cancer in the western part of the world, was suspected to be relevant for non-Hongshan non-China’s relatives of the ancient Hongshan yDNA O-M134 individual. The development of medicine in the Hongshan culture should also explain the interest in the anatomy of the human body, the representation of which in the Hongshan jade art was intensively highlighted by one of western authors. It should be added that cases of cannibalism were not reported from the peaceful Hongshan culture.

Additionally, it should be mentioned that the materials of the article of The Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology defend mtDNA F1b1-a (https://www.yfull.com/mtree/F1b1-a/), to which the Grand Duke Dmitry Alexandrovich (yDNA N-VL29) of the Rurik Dynasty belonged as well (https://www.yfull.com/mtree/F1b1-a3a2a/), implying that its bearers should not be associated with the ancestry of the South African Khoisan population or its bearers should not be associated with mutations, observed in African cannibals, or its bearers should not be associated with the ancestry of deep African hominins, the divergence of some of whom may be as old as 5000000 years ago. Consequently, the materials of the articles of The Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (IVPP) aim to defend the Eastern Eurasian populations, and their findings do not aim to harm existing nationalities, of which some individuals of the Eastern Eurasian origin are the part.

Consequently, it should be mentioned that, whereas it was already observed that a basal case of yDNA N-M231* exists in the Tai-Kadai Hlai-related nationality, whose Late Neolithic ancestors migrated to the Hainan Island from a more closed inland area, it may be more important to know, along which route his most ancient ancestors had diffused from the homeland of ancient East Asians to become located in such a neighbourhood of the Pre-Austroasiatics and Pre-Austronesians: this taken route was mostly occupied by some non-Austroasiatic and non-Austronesian yDNA NO-M214*-affiliated ancestors of the ancient Tai-Kadai populations, but included at least some pre-Hmong-Mien ancestors, in accordance with the IVPP data.
Reply
#19
(08-23-2024, 01:44 AM)CLTVTE Wrote: Regarding “Hunnic” practices, such as the artificial cranial deformation or the use of crows, the article “The deep population history of northern East Asia from the Late Pleistocene to the Holocene” had already included genetic connections, crucial to individuals, related to such practices, and these connections involve the ancient yDNA DE sample, whose genetic participation proved to be important for individuals, related to such practices in China’s areas, adjacent to Central Asia:

NE-8 M AR11K AR13-10K 11,601–11,176 46.01 125.82 SS 34 27 1.5 D4o DE 274 0.421 225,066
Perhaps, it may be thought that yDNA DE is associated with the population, which was especially a part of the progenitor of the Eurasian population, therefore, the embryonic states of human ideas, practices and linguistic types (including more rare ones), which separated between Africa and Eurasia, may be associated with the beginning of such an ancient yDNA DE population as well.

NE-8 is not DE. He is C-M48* (xM86,B90).
Reply
#20
In “The deep population history of northern East Asia from the Late Pleistocene to the Holocene”, which has already been published, this ancient NE-8 sample from the Amur river basin was assigned to yDNA DE:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...7421005754

NE20 F AR33K AR33K 34,324–32,360CalBP B –
NE56 M AR19K AR19K 19,587–19,175CalBP G2 C2
NE34 M AR14.5K AR14K 14,932–14,176CalBP D4h3 C
NE-5 M AR14.1K AR14K 14,814–14,017CalBP D4h3a+@152 C
NE-1 F AR12K AR13-10K 12,735–12,486CalBP D4g –
NE-8 M AR11K AR13-10K 11,601–11,176CalBP D4o DE
NE57f M AR11K_deleted– 11,206–10,765CalBP – –
NE36f U AR10.6K_deleted– 11,065–10,513CalBP D4h4 –
NE-3 M AR10.6K AR13-10K 10,996–10,429CalBP M8 C
NE-4 M AR10.5K AR13-10K 10,740–10,302CalBP M8 C
NE30g M AR9.9K_2d.rel.AR10.5K_deleted- 10,167–9,676CalBP D4m C
NE45 M AR9.2K_o AR9.2K_o 9,425–9,029CalBP G1a1a P
NE44f M AR9.2K_deleted – 9,425–9,027CalBP D4c1 –
NE35 F AR8.9K ARpost9K 9,131–8,770CalBP R11 –
NE-16 F AR8.5K ARpost9K 8,723–8,421CalBP D4o –
NE49 F AR8.3K ARpost9K 8,425–8,204CalBP D4o –
NE39 M AR8.1K ARpost9K 8,340–8,029CalBP D4m2 C
NE58h M AR7.3K_LowCov – 7,425–7,168CalBP D4e5 –
NE-18f M AR7K_deleted– 7,245–6,894CalBP D4h3 –
NE19 M AR7K ARpost9K 7,167–6,854CalBP F1b1+@152 C
NE29 F AR6.87K ARpost9K 6,993–6,747CalBP D4c1 –
NE-22 M AR6.84K ARpost9K 6,986–6,676CalBP D4m C
NE-9 F AR6.33K ARpost9K 6,440–6,205CalBP C4a1a+195
NE-2 M AR6.32K ARpost9K 6,437–6,201CalBP D4m C
NE61h U AR3.4K_LowCov – 3,485–3,360CalBP D4b1a2a –
Reply
#21
(08-23-2024, 09:52 AM)CLTVTE Wrote: In “The deep population history of northern East Asia from the Late Pleistocene to the Holocene”, which has already been published, this ancient NE-8 sample from the Amur river basin was assigned to yDNA DE:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...7421005754

What this has to do with his genuine haplogroup, which is C-M48, confirmed by checking the BAM directly?
Reply
#22
Samples that belonged to the members of the royal Aba family (HUAS57, HUAS261, HUAS262 and HUAS581) will split clade N-M2019>Y10755>M2058>A9408>PH1612>A9407>A9416, with three derived and two ancestral SNPs:

A9416+
FT7362+
Y51398+
FT8264-
Y55488-
A9417 *not covered*
Reply
#23
The unrelatedness to African “ghost populations”
The IVPP data imply that ghost populations, whose representatives would derive from “died-out” variants of populations, related specifically to South African hunter-gathers, or from “died-out” variants of populations, related specifically to other African groups, were not related to the origin of ancient East Asian ethnic groups. The IVPP data imply that, after the ancient East Asians had already originated, small later “exceptions” to such mentioned observations, related to minor subgroups, which were under foreign influence and which were already mostly located outside East Asia, may manifest themselves in the sphere of mythology, when elements of mythological worldviews, which had remnants in Africa, but which were completely alien to mainstream lines of thought, reflected in ancient Eurasian mythologies, sometimes appeared. Perhaps, a good example to illustrate it is the recent discovery of a geographically isolated language isolate of the non-African origin (such a particular language isolate as a whole is most likely unrelated to languages of yDNA K2a populations (except for a couple of later loanwords), because languages, whose bearers were related to yDNA K2a* populations in accordance with the IVPP data, did not form a tight cluster with such a language isolate in the relevant linguistic research), the distribution of which at the margins of China is limited to people of a single village so far: while it can be deduced that such a tiny population was under the influence of a Proto-Indo-European population (for example, one of important loanwords in that language resembles a loanword from a language of the Proto-Indo-European chronological level, though such a loanword does not seem to be present in East Asian languages), but a certain curse, which was reported from that language isolate, is clearly in line with elements of the mythological worldview, which had remnants in Africa, but which was completely alien to mainstream lines of thought in Eurasia, though some western writers had claimed the existence of a rare and strange mythological parallel in the ancient Indo-Aryan writings, which was suitable enough to validate the use of such a curse in the discussed language isolate, which is otherwise of a non-African origin, but ancestors of its speakers were likely influenced by one of Proto-Indo-European populations. The IVPP data support the distribution of the remains of such strange mythological motifs along with the distribution of a Western Eurasia-related autosomal component, which may be thought to contain such “African ghost population” inclusions.

The naming of yDNA N-M231-related and almost "died-out" yDNA N-M231*-related populations in China (unrelated to the above mentioned African “ghost populations”)

[1] The naming of populations, from which surviving lineages derived

“Boshan” is a known yDNA N-Z4762>…>N-CTS582*-related ancient specimen, located on the continent in Boshan (博山 “Boshan”), the name of which, being rendered in writing using the “rather abstract” ancient name 博山 “Boshan, a legendary mountain (/shān/) on the island of the immortals”, is likely to reflect the sounding of the previous ethnic meaning of the /Bo/ part in the name “Boshan”, which would mean “the mountains of the Bo” in the real world in this case.
One of the known features from languages of such populations is the root vowel alteration: /a/ for the indefinite number, /e/ for the dual number, /o/ for the singular number in accordance with the IVPP data.
According to the IVPP data, the ancient word /*ba/ “the indefinite number of human persons”, being the parallel development to the slightly more geographically eastern Pre-Austronesian word /*ban/ “a human person” (compare to the Old Indonesian word /wan/ “a human person”) was likely to develop among the part of such populations, ancestral to Boshan, which, having separated from the homeland of ancient East Asians ca. 38100 years ago, interacted with a narrow variant of an mtDNA M-related ancient East Asian population, the remains of which were rather widely distributed in East Asia (the male uniparental in the population, which had left such remains, would be yDNA NO*). That is, the mtDNA lineages of such a population were not closely related to more rare lineages, such as mtDNA M61, mtDNA M71, which were initially distributed close to those borders, caused by natural geographic environment, which today sometimes roughly coincide with some of the modern borders of the territory of China, in accordance with the IVPP data. One should suspect that if such an mtDNA M-related ancient East Asian population distributed without the participation of yDNA N-M231-related groups, then the word /*ban/ “a human person”, having an suffix-like element /-n/, potentially pointing to an agglutinating language, would appear; if such an mtDNA M-related ancient East Asian population distributed with the participation of yDNA N-M231-related groups, then the word /*ba/ “the indefinite number of human persons” would be distributed, being characteristic of a more analytic language (that is, unrelated to Chukotko-Kamchatkan, Eskimo-Aleut, Nivkh and agglutinating Yukaghir), the /r/-related plural particle being applicable to the variant /*bo/ in singular with the possibility to omit the plural particle, depending on the context (for example, if /*bo/ were a part of a compound word, where another element would derive from a word, which could imply the meaning of plurality by itself).

The IVPP data point to the type of the ancient population, with which some members of the ancient “Ba” population had to mix in order to form the initial population of the “A Ba” (approximately meaning “the non-customary Ba, mixing with other ethnicities”).

[2] The naming of populations, from which surviving lineages did not derive, in accordance with the IVPP data

Having separated 38100 years ago from the homeland of ancient East Asians, some of such populations could predominantly continue to interact with mtDNA N lineages, distributed among ancient East Asians, which would imply a better preservation of the “non-innovative” initial words for human persons, related to Proto-Sinitic /*ren/ “human person” (in this word, the phonetic value of the sound, usually denoted by /r/, was dubious), which produced numerous related words in numerous East Asian languages, belonging to different “language families”. For the yDNA N-M231-related population, such word for human persons would sound close to /*lən/ in accordance with the IVPP data. The populations, containing remains of those main /*lən/-related populations in accordance with the IVPP data, only have virtually purely analytic languages, which supports the idea that the 38100-year-old yDNA N-M231-related populations, having both surviving and died-out descendants, had been distributing analytic languages in the first place. Such a word for humans persons, that is, /*lən/, was already quite similar to non-Austroasiatic /*ləni/ “sky” (which resembled a not-closely-related Proto-Austronesian word /*laŋits-/ “sky”), the remains of which can be found as a preservation of the non-Austroasiatic component in the speech of the yDNA N-M231(xN1)-related Bateq population, which adopted the Aslian Austroasiatic language at least during the medieval period. Though the ancestors of representatives of directly-surviving yDNA N-M231 lineages should have later adopted one more “newer” slightly similarly sounding word for a human elder from the language of yDNA O-M175-related population, related to the basal yDNA O-M122 population, the modern descendants of which are the Han Chinese, the similarity of words for human persons and the sky (/*lən/-/*ləni/) should have caused the beginning of the process of the mythological association of the origin of humans “from the sky”, which is evident from the IVPP data. Interestingly, some of the surrounding small ancient East Asian populations had words for “the Sun”, which should have phonetically resembled words for “humans” in languages of other neighbouring small ancient East Asian populations. The IVPP data suggest that the appearing mythological idea of the origin of humans “from the sky” served as a catalyst for the formation of the regional mythological idea that the Sun was a “celestial human”. When such a conglomerate of tribes, already relatively well versed in mythological “celestial connections” of humans, encountered the representatives of the extremely “yellow-skinned” ethnic groups (even as compared to other ancient East Asian populations), they should have exported the flattering mythological idea that these extremely “yellow-skinned” ethnic groups had ancestors, related to the Sun as a “celestial human”, which should have made some members of the “extremely yellow-skinned populations” adopt their native word for the Sun as a part of their tribal name. As a result, the tribal name for the combined population and its members (that is, /*e̝lən/) should have appeared to the south of the Qingling-Huaihe line of China in accordance with the IVPP data. The IVPP data suggest that the “mythological” remain of such a “Sun-Sky”-related population (that is, /*e̝lən/-related population), living not so far from the Early Upper Paleolithic period, should have reached the mythology of a virtually died-out Paleo-population of Western Eurasia, and the IVPP data point to populations, having connections in Western Eurasia and being directly unrelated to Kostenki14, for which the forms, deriving from the phonetic simplification of the derived words /*Eln-/ or /*iln-/, would be relevant as well.
Reply
#24
The rise and transformation of Bronze Age pastoralists in the Caucasus
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08113-5

From supplementary information:

"TIP001, BZNK-1024/1, kurgan 2, grave 4. Context information: single inhumation of a male individual in left-side crouched position, with the head in the east, in a rectangular pit with rounded corners. A typical Lola bone pendant or belt hook was found with the human remains. Cultural affiliation & dating: Lola/post-Catacomb horizon, GIN-11427: 3640±50 BP (cal. BC 2128-1938, cal. BC 2192-1887), hb. Comment: Paleoproteomic analysis proved the consumption of dairy products from sheep and goat milk31."

https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/N-P189/story
Reply
#25
Long time ago, the Japanese researcher Takashi Gakuhari showed the existence of the Laos Hoabinhian => Kusunda => ancient Lake Baikal genetic cline in his peace of research. The data of the IVPP (The Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology) imply that a journey from south to north (out of China), to a certain degree similar to the one of the Laos Hoabinhian-related population, could be taken by representatives of yDNA N2-Y6503 haplogroup as well.

Most interestingly, in "Human population history at the crossroads of East and Southeast Asia since 11,000 years ago", the yDNA O1b*-affiliated specimen, derived from a population, ancestral to yDNA O1b2-P49, formed a cline with some representatives, related to the Chinese Buta Daurs (”Buta” somewhat resembled “Botai”, in which culture yDNA N2-Y6503 was found as well). The other IVPP data imply that Ta should have been the basic name for the most ancient Paleolithic yDNA O1b*-related Tai-Kadai-related populations (yDNA O1b2 had also split from them to Korea in the Paleolithic in accordance with the IVPP data, and the “lexical” separation of the Korean language from “Tai-Kadai-Austronesian” was attested in Jager, 2015), at least before yDNA O1b2-P49 individuals in Korea shifted to the name ”Ji” due to having become dominated by 19000 years ago by the “northern” yDNA C2-M217 population (an AR19K-related predecessor of Altaic groups) in accordance with the IVPP data. One should caution that the IVPP data imply that both ancient yDNA N-M231 and yDNA O1b2-P49 should have initially been the speakers of analytic languages, and the materials of “Lake-centered sedentary lifestyle of early Tibetan Plateau Indigenous populations at high elevation 4,400 years ago” imply that at least the “Bu-related” population, affiliated to the area of Mabu Co (in which the autosomal DNA of the died-out yDNA N-M231*-related population could not have been modeled by the DNA of the younger yDNA N-M231-related populations), which, being located on the southern part of the Tibetan Plateau, in addition manifested the genetic connection to an yDNA C2-M217-affiliated Korean speaker of an Altaic language in Northeast China, could not have influenced the linguistic situation (related to consequent later Altaic languages of Northeast China) more than the materials of the only attested ancient East Asian analytic language, affiliated with that Mabu Co region as well (at least as a language, which can be viewed as having been developed on this “Mabu Co”-related substratum), that is, the language of the Myazedi Pyu inscription, would allow to suggest. The data of “Lake-centered sedentary lifestyle of early Tibetan Plateau Indigenous populations at high elevation 4,400 years ago” imply that the “Mabu Co”-related influence of the population, akin to those Bu, split along two directions (a Korean-related direction and a non-Korean-related direction), and the data of “Lake-centered sedentary lifestyle of early Tibetan Plateau Indigenous populations at high elevation 4,400 years ago” imply that the ancestor of yDNA N-M2126 Yakut nobles should have started to interact with the remains of the population from this non-Korean-related direction in the area of Inner Mongolia, parallel to the distribution of populations, related to the Banlashan settlement of the Hongshan culture (that is, in the area of Inner Mongolia, having a connection to Tibet and being located to the south of the Banlashan settlement)), which probably presupposed the future Altaic affiliation of those Yakut nobles, who might have later passed via the stage of connections with the populations of the Mongolic affiliation, and the neighborhood of the North Chinese people (which had necessary genetic connections in “Ancient genomes revealed the complex human interactions of the ancient western Tibetans” so as to be considered responsible for the formation in mythology of some types of the “multilayered sky” worldview, which influenced some Altaic populations and possibly early Buddhist individuals, being interconnected with Buddhist immigrants to Japan in addition (at least on the level of genetic connections in the data of “Ancient genomes revealed the complex human interactions of the ancient western Tibetans”) ) and the neighborhood of the more northern populations of the Middle Neolithic Hongshan culture, which tended to influence the formation of the East Asia-derived part of Altaic populations, both might have helped the ancestor of yDNA N-M2126 Yakut nobles to form their own variants of their traditional “multilayered sky” worldview, which was more “pretentious” as compared to [1] the earlier “Paleolithic” view on the sky of yDNA N-M231 populations of China, which during the early period should have presupposed the affection between a male sky deity, located above and watching via his two non-simultaneously open “Sun and Moon” eyes of his “face” into two eyes of the opposite face of a female earth deity, located below, in accordance with the IVPP data (which might be distantly resemblant of the reason for “child birth” in the Greek myth about Gaia (Mother Earth) and Uranus (Father Sky) and which implies the way, in which the fragmentary data on the mythology of the yDNA N-M231(xN1) Bateq of Malaysia should be interpreted); [2] the earlier “Paleolithic” view of the Moon and the sky and the earlier “Paleolithic” view of the world as the “closed container” of Paleolithic populations, being unrelated to yDNA N-M231 and connecting Siberia, Tibet and the Papunesian part of the Hoabinhian ancestors.
Reply
#26
There's a spreadsheet going around with Y-DNA and mtDNA haplogroups from the unpublished Avar-period paper. The author is apparently  unknown; I found it in the newest Musaeum Scythia blog post.

Alongside MLE003 (now on YFull) and two N-F4205 samples, MGS151 apparently belongs to N-L551. He is from Mödling–Lerchengasse, which is context dated to the first half of the 5th century AD.
https://www.academia.edu/35830659/Single...n_English_
Reply
#27
N-L551?! That is surprising. Such a rare Balto-Polish subhaplogroup.
~ Per aspera ad hominem ~
Y-DNA: N-Z1936 >> CTS8565 >> BY22114 (Savonian)
mtDNA: H5a1e (Northern Fennoscandian)
Reply
#28
(11-21-2024, 01:52 AM)Jaska Wrote: N-L551?! That is surprising. Such a rare Balto-Polish subhaplogroup.
Rare in world context. In Lithuanian context quite frequent. Haplogroup of Gediminids > Jagellons.
Reply
#29
(11-21-2024, 08:48 AM)Parastais Wrote:
(11-21-2024, 01:52 AM)Jaska Wrote: N-L551?! That is surprising. Such a rare Balto-Polish subhaplogroup.
Rare in world context. In Lithuanian context quite frequent. Haplogroup of Gediminids > Jagellons.

I would say: quite frequent in L551 circles only.
Discover gives 41 Lithuanian men = 2 % only.
~ Per aspera ad hominem ~
Y-DNA: N-Z1936 >> CTS8565 >> BY22114 (Savonian)
mtDNA: H5a1e (Northern Fennoscandian)
Reply
#30
(11-22-2024, 02:37 AM)Jaska Wrote:
(11-21-2024, 08:48 AM)Parastais Wrote:
(11-21-2024, 01:52 AM)Jaska Wrote: N-L551?! That is surprising. Such a rare Balto-Polish subhaplogroup.
Rare in world context. In Lithuanian context quite frequent. Haplogroup of Gediminids > Jagellons.

I would say: quite frequent in L551 circles only.
Discover gives 41 Lithuanian men = 2 % only.
Commercial sites underestimate weight of N subclades for Baltic populations. First, commercial sites believe only 20% of LT is N, where all scientific publications so far got number from 38% to 42%. Second, lots of Baltic men don’t order deeper subclades than plain N. In general there are 4 major N subclades in Lithuanians and this is one of those 4. Still likely below 10% (40% of Y is N /4 subclades) of LT men, but wouldn’t call it rare in Lithuania. Like what is not rare in Lithuania then? Other 3 N subclades?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)