Check for new replies
Column number mismatch
#16
(12-30-2024, 05:36 PM)AimSmall Wrote: I recognize your Target coordinates... most likely the average of the Germany_Ilsenhöhle_LRJ_UP samples.  I was playing with them yesterday on the Refugium Discord

wdym averages these are my coordinates?
Reply
#17
Your source data is K36, not G25. Thirty-seven columns vs 26 columns (first column being the sample id). The number of columns has to match (so PCA coordinate system). This is a Monte Carlo simulation. The data has to match. Your Target coordinates are G25.

If your whole goal is to analyze the Target G25 data, find a suitable G25 source/calculator to compare against.

If your goal is to play with the K36 data source you keep posting, find a K36 Target to evaluate. You can't mix and match 36 with 25 or 13 or any other. They have to be the same PCA coordinate system.
Reply
#18
(12-30-2024, 05:49 PM)AimSmall Wrote: Your source data is K36, not G25.  Thirty-seven columns vs 26 columns (first column being the sample id).  The number of columns has to match (so PCA coordinate system).  This is a Monte Carlo simulation.  The data has to match.  Your Target coordinates are G25.

If your whole goal is to analyze the Target G25 data, find a suitable G25 source/calculator to compare against.

If your goal is to play with the K36 data source you keep posting, find a K36 Target to evaluate.  You can't mix and match 36 with 25 or 13 or any other.  They have to be the same PCA coordinate system.
Ah I see. How do you get k36 Targets, as in can you convert your raw data to that?
Reply
#19
I don't know of anything that converts to K36. Most go the other way and convert K36 to G25.

To generate K36 you can use GEDmatch or Admixture Studio. You'll need raw autosomal data for each.
curiosity likes this post
Reply
#20
(12-30-2024, 06:02 PM)AimSmall Wrote: I don't know of anything that converts to K36.  Most go the other way and convert K36 to G25.

To generate K36 you can use GEDmatch or Admixture Studio.  You'll need raw autosomal data for each.

Yeah thats what I meant. Thanks.
Reply

Check for new replies

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)